Criptotendencias - Noticias de bitcoin, criptomonedas y blockchain
miércoles, noviembre 26, 2025
  • Actualidad
  • Bitcoin
  • Análisis Criptofinanciero
  • Altcoins
  • Blockchain
  • Tecnología
  • Base de conocimiento
Sin resultado
Ver todos los resultados
Criptotendencias - Noticias de bitcoin, criptomonedas y blockchain
  • Actualidad
  • Bitcoin
  • Análisis Criptofinanciero
  • Altcoins
  • Blockchain
  • Tecnología
  • Base de conocimiento
Sin resultado
Ver todos los resultados
Criptotendencias - Noticias de bitcoin, criptomonedas y blockchain
Sin resultado
Ver todos los resultados
Inicio Actualidad

Axie Infinity se convierte en los NFT’s más comercializados de la historia en el tercer trimestre de 2021

Germán Galindo por Germán Galindo
octubre 15, 2021
en Actualidad
Tiempo de lectura: 2 mins lectura
0
Axie Infinity se convierte en los NFT’s más comercializados de la historia en el tercer trimestre de 2021
74
Compartido
1.2k
Vistas
Compartir en TwitterCompartir en LinkedInCompartir en WhatsApp

El ya exitoso juego NFT Axie Infinity pasa a ser la coleccion de tokens no fungibles más negociados de la historia en el tercer trimestre del 2021, muy por encima de NBA Top Shot y Criptopunks, con un volumen de negociación de más de 2.500 millones de dólares. Según reportes de DappRadar, dicho volumen representa el 83% de su valor en negociación.

Fuente: DappRadar

El ingreso de 800 millones de dólares sólo es superado por Ethereum. A finales de septiembre, el equipo habilitó el staking de AXS. Esto agrega una modalidad de ingresos pasivos a la vez que permite seguir jugando en la plataforma.En esa dinámica, 10.000 de los primeros usuarios de Axie recibieron recompensas por un total de 800.000 AXS que fueron distribuidas entre todas las billeteras. Axie Infinity produjo 2.080 millones de dólares en el tercer trimestre, lo que constituye el 19% de todo el volúmen de operaciones de todo el ecosistema NFT durante ese tiempo.

Hace poco, el estudio Sky Mavis recibió un fondo de 152 millones de dólares de a16z una firma de Venture Capital, con miras a desarrollar más el juego. próximanente, Axie Infinity permitirá batallas PVP mejoradas, características terrestres digitales, y su propio exchange descentralizado.

Entérate de todo del acontecer cripto! 🚀 Síguenos en X: @cripto_t

En otro orden de ideas, Axie Infinity lanzó el 14 de octubre su actualización 1.1.0a, en la que incluye entre sus características el reseteo de los Axies al nivel 1 cada vez que cambien de propietario y el regreso de la opción de desfiar a tus amigos.

✨Axie Infinity Version 1.1.0a Update

👇 pic.twitter.com/01O7WXirc1

— Axie Infinity🦇🔊 (@AxieInfinity) October 15, 2021

¡Únete a nuestro grupo de Telegram en CriptoTendencias.com y mantente al tanto de las últimas noticias y tendencias en el mundo de las criptomonedas!

También evita que las cuentas con un índice de emparejamiento inferior a 800 copas obtengan la moneda SLP de Axie en las aventuras, la arena o la misión diaria.

🚨@AXIEINFINITY UPDATE🚨

✅Improvements to the game’s performance
✅Axies will now reset to level one anytime they change owners
✅Challenges are back for friendly duels
✅ Accounts under 800 MMR will no longer receive SLP from adventure, arena, or the daily quest#Axieinfinity

— Sam Withers 🌖 (@djsamwithers) October 15, 2021

Mejoras en el rendimiento del juego. Los Axies ahora se restablecerán al nivel uno cada vez que cambien de propietario. Vuelven los desafíos para los duelos amistosos Las cuentas por debajo de 800 MMR ya no recibirán SLP de la aventura, la arena o la misión diaria

Para minería en solitario: Minero SOLO SATOSHI de 1.2TH/s y busca esa recompensa por solo USD 199... hecho en Estados Unidos

¡Únete GRATIS a Binance ahora! 💥 Ahorra en comisiones para siempre y maximiza tus ganancias en criptomonedas. 🌟 ¡Regístrate hoy y lleva tus inversiones al siguiente nivel!.

Tags: Axie InfinityNFTtecnologia
Entrada anterior

La CFTC multa a Tether y Bitfinex con 42 millones de dólares

Próxima publicación

EU set to launch formal probe into Nzivia’s $54bn takeover of Arm

Próxima publicación

EU set to launch formal probe into Nzivia’s $54bn takeover of Arm

Discussion about this post

Publicidad

Entradas recientes

  • Bolivia apuesta por las stablecoin: el gobierno integra activos digitales al sistema financiero
  • El enorme movimiento de Bitcoin de Coinbase desató alarmas injustificadas: qué ocurrió realmente
  • On Nov. 21, Cardano’s mainnet bifurcated into two competing histories after a single malformed staking-delegation transaction exploited a dormant bug in newer node software. For roughly 14 and a half hours, stake pool operators and infrastructure providers watched as blocks piled up on two separate chains: one “poisoned” branch that accepted the invalid transaction and one “healthy” branch that rejected it. Exchanges paused ADA flows, wallets showed conflicting balances, and developers raced to ship patched node versions that would reunify the ledger under a single canonical history. No funds vanished, and the network never fully halted. Still, for half a day, Cardano lived the scenario Ethereum’s client-diversity advocates warn about: a consensus split triggered by software disagreement rather than an intentional fork. Cardano co-founder Charles Hoskinson said he alerted the FBI and “relevant authorities” after a former stake-pool operator admitted broadcasting the malformed delegation transaction. Law enforcement’s role here is to investigate possible criminal interference with a protected computer network, under statutes like the U.S. Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, since deliberately (or recklessly) pushing an exploit to a live, interstate financial infrastructure can constitute unauthorized disruption, even if framed as “testing.” The incident offers a rare natural experiment in how layer-1 blockchains handle validation failures. Cardano preserved liveness, blocks kept coming, but sacrificed temporary uniqueness, creating two legitimate-looking chains that had to be merged back together. Solana, by contrast, has repeatedly chosen the opposite trade-off: when its single client hits a fatal bug, the network halts outright and restarts under coordinated human intervention. Ethereum aims to sit between those extremes by running multiple independent client implementations, betting that no single codebase can drag the entire validator set onto an invalid chain. Cardano’s split and the speed with which it resolved test whether a monolithic architecture with version skew can approximate the safety properties of genuine multi-client redundancy, or whether it simply got lucky. The bug and the partition Intersect, Cardano’s ecosystem governance body, traced the failure to a legacy deserialization bug in hash-handling code for delegation certificates. The flaw entered the codebase in 2022 but remained dormant until new execution paths exposed it in node versions 10.3.x through 10.5.1. When a malformed delegation transaction carrying an oversized hash hit the mempool around 08:00 UTC on Nov. 21, newer nodes accepted it as valid and built blocks on top of it. Older nodes and tooling that had not migrated to the affected code path correctly rejected the transaction as malformed. That single disagreement over validation split the network. Stake pool operators running buggy versions extended the poisoned chain, while operators on older software extended the healthy one. Ouroboros, Cardano’s proof-of-stake protocol, instructs each validator to follow the heaviest valid chain it observes, but “valid” had two different definitions depending on which node version processed the transaction. The result was a live partition: both branches continued producing blocks under normal consensus rules, but they diverged from a common ancestor and could not reconcile without manual intervention. The pattern had appeared on Cardano’s Preview testnet the day before, triggered by nearly identical delegation logic. That testnet incident alerted engineers to the bug in a low-stakes environment. Still, the fix had not yet propagated to mainnet when a former stake-pool operator, who later claimed he followed AI-generated instructions, submitted the same malformed transaction to the production network. Within hours, the chain had split, and infrastructure providers faced the question of which fork to treat as canonical. Safe failure without a kill switch Cardano’s partition resolved itself through voluntary upgrades rather than emergency coordination. Intersect and core developers shipped patched versions of node, 10.5.2 and 10.5.3, which correctly rejected the malformed transaction and rejoined the healthy chain. As stake pool operators and exchanges adopted the patches, the weight of consensus gradually tipped back toward a single ledger. By the end of Nov. 21, the network had converged, and the poisoned branch was abandoned. The incident exposed an uncomfortable gap: two canonical ledgers existed simultaneously, but several boundaries prevented it from cascading into a deep reorganization or permanent loss of finality. First, the bug lived in application-layer validation logic, not in Cardano’s cryptographic primitives or Ouroboros’ chain-selection rules. Signature checks and stake weighting continued to operate normally. The disagreement centered solely on whether the delegation transaction met ledger validity conditions. Second, the partition was asymmetric. Many critical actors, including older stake pool operators and some exchanges, ran software that rejected the bad transaction, ensuring substantial stake weight remained behind the healthy chain from the start. Third, Cardano had pre-positioned a disaster-recovery plan under CIP-135, which documented a process for coordinating around a canonical chain in more extreme scenarios. Intersect is prepared to invoke that plan as a fallback, but voluntary upgrades proved sufficient to restore consensus under normal Ouroboros rules. The narrow scope of the bug also mattered. The flaw affected a specific hash deserialization routine for delegation transactions, a bounded attack surface that could be patched and closed without requiring broader protocol changes. Once fixed, the exploit path disappeared, and no generalizable class of malformed transactions remained available to trigger future splits.
  • Polymarket obtiene luz verde de EE. UU. y reconfigura el sector
  • Wall Street frena a Strategy pese a su imperio Bitcoin

Síguenos en X

¿Qué es el staking de criptomonedas y cómo ganar ingresos pasivos en Web3? - 2025 https://t.co/ytA0xc8Vaf pic.twitter.com/1TsmzbLtqV

— CriptoTendencias (@cripto_t) September 2, 2025
  • Contáctanos
  • Publicidad
  • Nosotros

© 2022 Criptotendencias.com - SEO & Web Consultor SEO.

Sin resultado
Ver todos los resultados
  • Home
  • Actualidad
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Base de conocimiento
  • Podcast
  • Publicidad
  • Opinión
  • Contáctanos
  • Autor invitado

© 2022 Criptotendencias.com - SEO & Web Consultor SEO.